Calls interrupt the room
Guests can reserve or send the right enquiry without waiting for someone to answer.
Restaurant reservation systems
Guests reserve direct while you control covers, turn times, joined tables and the capacity held for walk-ins. A focused restaurant reservation system is usually £600 - £1,200 and works with an existing or new website.
No per-cover fee from Ernest. Payment, messaging and third-party providers may charge their own fees.
The guest promise and the host floor plan agree.
Try it without signing up
Change the party size and time, then confirm the pretend reservation. Nothing is sent or stored. The floor plan shows why a real reservation system needs capacity rules behind the form.
1 hour 30 minutes·No deposit
Main dining roomChoose a time
Fits one two-seat table without changing the held walk-in capacity.
26 of 40 covers now reserved
What gets lost without one route
Calls during service, messages across several channels, table combinations and held walk-in capacity make reservations more than a contact form. One dependable route prevents a guest promise from disagreeing with the floor plan.
Guests can reserve or send the right enquiry without waiting for someone to answer.
Website, phone and walk-in records meet in one agreed working view.
The confirmation checks current inventory, table combinations and held capacity.
Clear policies, reminders and proportionate deposits can protect the difficult bookings.
Rules before features
The useful work is deciding what the website may promise at each service, not adding another calendar to the site.
Set realistic duration by party size and spread arrivals so one time does not overwhelm the kitchen.
Know which tables can join, which must stay separate and what is genuinely suitable for a party.
Hold capacity back, pause online availability and route exceptional groups to staff approval.
Apply reminders, deposits, card holds or cancellation terms only where they are useful and supported.
One reservation, start to finish
The guest selects a valid party size and service time. The system checks the agreed floor plan and capacity rules, collects only the useful details and optional payment, stores the reservation, then confirms it and runs the reminder or change route.
The system never invents a table. It confirms from the agreed source or clearly asks staff to review the request.
Only valid times appear after the party and floor rules are applied.
Name, contact route, access or dietary note and the agreed payment step.
The authoritative record updates before the guest receives confirmation.
Routine changes stay attached to the same reservation instead of becoming another message.
Choose the right ownership level
Best for restaurants, cafes, pubs and other businesses reserving finite spaces. Keep a trusted platform when it already runs service well, own a focused route on the website when the rules are contained, or build a fuller app when staff need live floor status and permissions.
Keep its floor plan and staff workflow. Improve the direct website route through a supported link, widget or API.
Best when the operating tool already earns its place.Use your own rules and records without paying Ernest per cover or renting features the venue does not need.
Best for a clear floor plan and contained workflow.Add staff access, live table status, waitlist, multiple areas, guest notes, reporting and custom permissions.
Best when the table diary is only one part of service.One inventory principle, different spaces
Covers, turns, joined tables, walk-in holds, large parties and a host view built around the real room.
See restaurant website work →Capacity, layouts, enquiry approval, menus, deposits and an agreed handover to the events team.
See event website work →Dates, capacity, unit rules and closures can follow the same inventory principle when the business needs a focused route.
Find the closest industry →A salon chair, clinic practitioner or service visit is a time-slot problem, with different availability and staff rules.
See the online booking system →Connections checked before the quote
A link, widget, export or API can all be valid. Ernest checks what the selected provider actually exposes, which direction records move and what staff do if that connection fails.
Simultaneous requests and stale availability tested
Payment success, failure and refund route agreed
Manual fallback written for service staff
Proof is a working shift
The interactive floor plan above is an illustration, not a claim about your capacity. Your build uses the real room, service periods and staff decisions. Acceptance testing follows the situations that usually break a generic form.
See restaurant website experienceRestaurant reservation system price
The range covers one contained reservation route. The proposal names the floor plan, service rules, messages, payment behaviour and connections before the build begins.
See all website and system pricesPrice rises with multiple rooms or venues, live floor status, waitlists, staff permissions, migration, POS integration, complex payments or closed third-party systems.
Support is optional. Payment, SMS, email, POS or reservation platforms may charge their own fees directly.
Before the reservation build
Yes, if it works and provides a dependable direct route. I check whether the website should use a link, widget or documented API, which system owns availability and what happens when the connection is unavailable before proposing replacement.
A confirmed reservation must check one authoritative inventory at the final step, not rely on an old screen. I test simultaneous requests, table combinations, service limits and stale sessions. Exceptional parties can become staff-reviewed enquiries instead of automatic promises.
Yes. Online capacity can be lower than the physical room and can vary by service or time. Staff can also pause availability or hold particular tables when the agreed workflow supports it.
Yes, through a suitable payment provider and an agreed policy. Deposits, full prepayment or card holds are separate behaviours, so the proposal states which one applies, how cancellation works and which provider fees remain payable.
They can follow a separate enquiry and approval route rather than appearing as ordinary instant availability. The system can collect the event details, hold a provisional option, request a deposit after approval and keep the handover visible to staff.
Sometimes. It depends on the available export or API, the quality of table and guest fields and the permission to use those records. I map and test a small import before migration is included in the build.
Bring the floor plan and one busy service
The first conversation maps covers, turns, exceptions and the system staff already use. You will know whether to keep, connect or replace it before a build is proposed.